From a Guinness event it should evolve into a comprehensive program. It should be continuous. There should be a space for leveli
ng up, a deepening of understanding based on rights, solidarity and equality of citizens, especially the climate disaster survivors.
We do not want another GREEN REVOLUTION reminiscent of the Marcos dictatorship. It was everything but green and everything but a revolution. The program promoted the pesticides and fertilizers of big corporation and benefited only the business sector. There was no genuine agrarian reform and the supposed support for the farmers did not bring about development for the farmers.
Of course we want a treevolution that translates into the kind of trees being planted.[]
There should be diversity in the species being planted and should not be confined to cash crops. There should be more trees that contribute to the prevention or reduction of soil erosion or bring about climate solution that should be planted, like the bamboos and the mangroves and forest trees. The trees should be planted to protect biodiversity and prevent erosion and improve the livelihood of the communities as a result of the climate solution.
The better solution then is rainforestation whereby at least 30 species of trees should be planted per hectare.
The treevolution should be people-centered. The event should not be done to favor corporations because they are required carbon sink. The people’s output should not be part of that required of the corporations. We have different responsibilities and more is required of those who use the most resources.
Furthermore, the program planners should be aware that the treevolution is not cure .