PASIG CITY (MindaNews/15 July) – Lawyer Marvic Leonen, Dean of the University of the Philippines’ College of Law, is the new government chair in the peace negotiations with the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF).
At 47, Leonen, is also the youngest peace panel chair in the history of the GRP-MILF negotiations.
Leonen told MindaNews earlier today that he thought about the offer for “a few days,” adding he had to “consider my work as Dean of the College of Law, the status of the current negotiations and of course whether I had something positive to contribute. The latter includes whether I would be able to have the critical support of those that I have worked with in Mindanao as well as effectively dialogue with the key leaders of government.”
Leonen’s being a non-Mindanawon may be a concern to some but Deles said the Mindanao problem should not be viewed purely as a Mindanao concern “because it is a Philippine problem.”
Leonen told MindaNews, “Yes, unfortunately I am not a Mindanawon but I will be the emissary of the President (Exec. Ord. No. 3 and 555) representing the Government of the Republic of the Philippines. There will be others in a panel of five that will be from Mindanao and of course have had the experience working in Mindanao. Besides, I have always said that the Mindanao issues are also national issues.”
Mindanao’s peace advocates apparently see Leonen as an “excellent” and “brilliant” choice.
“Marvic as panel chair is excellent choice. He has both professional credentials plus ground experience. His personality is fit for negotiation and he has extensive experience with Indigenous Peoples. Great choice!,” Redemptorist Brother Karl Gaspar, anthropologist and author of several Mindanao books, said.
Lawyer Mary Ann Arnado, secretary-general of the Mindanao Peoples Caucus, said Leonen as chair is “a brilliant choice.”
“I am overwhelmed with joy. His appointment could only mean that P-Noy is serious about having a political negotiated settlement with the MILF. Leonen is highly credible, untainted in his advocacies and public service. He is one of the best legal minds on ancestral domain and right to self-determination. A brilliant, consistent, very grounded activist with a heart for the IPs and marginalized groups. Perfect choice to negotiate what could be the most crucial turning point of the GRP-MILF talks,” said Arnado.
Indeed, at the height of the hysteria over the botched Memorandum of Agreement on Ancestral Domain in the latter part of 2008, Leonen was among the few voices of reason.
The Supreme Court, by a vote of 8-7, declared the MOA-AD of the government and MILF peace panels, unconstitutional.
The SC decision was assailed by critics for, among others, allegedly not allowing “thinking out of the box” with several justices saying, among others, that the President “may negotiate but only within the parameters of the Constitution.”
On March 16, 2009, at the 1st International Solidarity Conference on Mindanao held in Davao City, Leonen, who delivered the keynote address, asked: “Why are the country’s political leaders quick to act on amending the Constitution to change nationalistic provisions for the benefit of foreigners or to extend their terms of office but are ‘allergic’ to amending the Constitution to address the people’s aspirations for self-determination?”
“I wonder why when foreign chambers of commerce say that we should change the nationalistic provisions in Article 12 of our Constitution, suddenly our political leaders want to change the provisions of the Constitution. I wonder why, whenever some person who wants to run for a fourth time in congress or a third time as a Senator suddenly says that it is important to look at parliamentary system of government or semi-parliamentary, semi-federal form of government, they .. initiate changes to the Constitution but whenever we talk about self-determination, many people upstairs, those in power, become allergic,” Leonen said.
“Do we listen only to foreigners? Do we listen only to people who are… in power? Or should we listen more to people who keep on saying, ‘you forgot us in your history, you forgot our culture, you hid our culture behind the concept of what is a Filipino, you hid our language in the concept of a national language, you hid our aspirations behind the barrel of a gun,’ and therefore I think it is important that we open our minds to actually looking at establishing that political leverage in order for people to be at that bargaining table whenever that negotiation happens.”
He listed at least 11 times when the Philippine Constitution underwent changes, from that Biak –na-Bato Constitution to the 1987 Constitution.
“This should be what we should aspire for as model – a Constitution that is constantly being reflected upon, debated upon, and as soon as the dominant political powers change and hopefully they truly represent the people – the masses — our people – change for the better,” he said.
At the height of the controversy over the MOA-AD in 2008, then House Speaker Prospero Nograles (of the 1st district of Davao City), pushed for Charter Change through House Resolution 737, which sought to scrap the 40% limit on foreign ownership, thereby allowing the “acquisition by foreign corporations and associations and the transfer or conveyance thereto, of alienable public and private lands.”
In a press statement in September 2008, Nograles said he filed HR 737 because of his “frustration in finding solutions that would end the four decades of armed conflict in some parts of Mindanao” which he said “is trapped in a chicken and egg situation.”
He said despite its natural wealth, fertile soil and favorable climate, Mindanao has remained at the tail-end of investment destinations in the Philippines because of the insurgency problem in the region. (Carolyn O. Arguillas/MindaNews)
