However, sometimes, monkeys are called clever, agile, tricky.
As an admonition, Mr. Zhao addressed it to his guests – diplomats and businessmen that included Philippine Foreign Affairs Secretary Albert del Rosario and US Ambassador to the Philippines Philip Goldberg. As admonition is mild reproof intended to correct a fault, Mr. Zhao, the admonisher, wanted his guests, the admonished, to correct a fault.
Did Mr. Zhao really intend to admonish? Was he not just inviting his guests to join him to correct a fault? Did he, perhaps, mean, “Let us be like monkeys”? On second thought, did he admonish or exhort? Exhortation, unlike admonition, is strong advice not reproof.
As Inquirer reported, “he was not mocking his guests. He was using the description of the monkey in the Chinese zodiac to point out how the Philippines and China should go about handling their affairs, including their territorial dispute in the South China Sea.”
The report quoted Mr. Zhao, first, apparently in the spirit of a New Year’s wish: “In the Chinese zodiac, the monkey symbolizes vitality, flexibility and intelligence. If you use your intelligence, show some flexibility, you will have a vigorous Chinese New Year. But, adding: “The same goes for the bilateral relations between China and the Philippines,” he was referring to South China Sea dispute. (Bold text ours)
Mr. Zhao was, indeed, admonishing the Philippines and the United States. China is the monkey symbolized in the Chinese zodiac; the Philippines and the US are not.
In admonishing, “Be like monkeys”, Mr. Zhao was saying in reference to the South China Sea dispute and to how each side wants it resolved, “China is right; the Philippines must do as China proposes and the US must stay out.”
Let’s see which monkey China is – as symbolized in the Chinese zodiac or as variously described in the Philippines.
First: This is China’s position: Historically, China Sea is ours. We cannot be bound by the United Nations Convention of the Seas (UNCLOS). We will not submit to arbitration by the UNCLOS Arbitral Tribunal in The Hague, Netherlands. We have offered bi-lateral negotiation. Take it or leave it. Is that “flexibility”?
Second: While offering bi-lateral negotiation, China reclaimed the disputed islets (reefs) of the Spratlys that, according the UNCLOS, lie within the jurisdiction of the Philippines with the right and responsibility to use and develop their ocean resources. By reclamation – constructing berthing areas and airstrips and other infrastructures for commercial and military uses – China has stamped her sovereignty over the disputed areas.[]